Comments on: Easily Unit Testing Event Handlers http://www.philosophicalgeek.com/2007/12/27/easily-unit-testing-event-handlers/ Code and musings by Ben Watson Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:16:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Ben http://www.philosophicalgeek.com/2007/12/27/easily-unit-testing-event-handlers/comment-page-1/#comment-165509 Ben Wed, 27 Oct 2010 01:49:00 +0000 http://www.philosophicalgeek.com/2007/12/27/easily-unit-testing-event-handlers/#comment-165509 Matthew, I don't think that will work because if that event handler is not called, then no assertion will be raised, thus the test passes erroneously. Matthew, I don’t think that will work because if that event handler is not called, then no assertion will be raised, thus the test passes erroneously.

]]> By: Matthew Oberlin http://www.philosophicalgeek.com/2007/12/27/easily-unit-testing-event-handlers/comment-page-1/#comment-165444 Matthew Oberlin Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:05:09 +0000 http://www.philosophicalgeek.com/2007/12/27/easily-unit-testing-event-handlers/#comment-165444 There is actually an easier way to do this using anonymous methods... <code> [Test] public void CheckStats() { BrickDatabase db = new BrickDatabase(tempFolder, maxCacheAge); db.InventoryStatsUpdated += delegate { Assert.IsTrue(true); }; db.DoSomethingThatFiresEvent(); } </code> There is actually an easier way to do this using anonymous methods…


[Test]
public void CheckStats()
{
BrickDatabase db = new BrickDatabase(tempFolder, maxCacheAge);

db.InventoryStatsUpdated += delegate
{
Assert.IsTrue(true);
};

db.DoSomethingThatFiresEvent();
}

]]> By: Madhuri Venkatesh http://www.philosophicalgeek.com/2007/12/27/easily-unit-testing-event-handlers/comment-page-1/#comment-129294 Madhuri Venkatesh Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:06:05 +0000 http://www.philosophicalgeek.com/2007/12/27/easily-unit-testing-event-handlers/#comment-129294 This is really smart. Thanks, but there could be a memory leak if we do not un-register the event-handler. See http://bytes.com/topic/c-sharp/answers/276123-memory-leak-c-2-0-w-anonymous-delegates This is really smart. Thanks, but there could be a memory leak if we do not un-register the event-handler.
See http://bytes.com/topic/c-sharp/answers/276123-memory-leak-c-2-0-w-anonymous-delegates

]]> By: Helpware http://www.philosophicalgeek.com/2007/12/27/easily-unit-testing-event-handlers/comment-page-1/#comment-64303 Helpware Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:07:06 +0000 http://www.philosophicalgeek.com/2007/12/27/easily-unit-testing-event-handlers/#comment-64303 Brilliant. This code was a great help. Thanks very much. Rob Brilliant. This code was a great help.
Thanks very much.
Rob

]]> By: Randolpho http://www.philosophicalgeek.com/2007/12/27/easily-unit-testing-event-handlers/comment-page-1/#comment-60340 Randolpho Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:07:54 +0000 http://www.philosophicalgeek.com/2007/12/27/easily-unit-testing-event-handlers/#comment-60340 Thanks for the tip, it's one that I'll remember. Or, barring that, one I'll return to with my new bookmark. :) Thanks for the tip, it’s one that I’ll remember.

Or, barring that, one I’ll return to with my new bookmark. :)

]]> By: saintc0d3r http://www.philosophicalgeek.com/2007/12/27/easily-unit-testing-event-handlers/comment-page-1/#comment-50524 saintc0d3r Fri, 11 Jul 2008 05:45:02 +0000 http://www.philosophicalgeek.com/2007/12/27/easily-unit-testing-event-handlers/#comment-50524 Excellent one..thanx for the insight that u describe through this article ..:-) Excellent one..thanx for the insight that u describe through this article ..:-)

]]>